Skip to the content.

AirGo Design Atlas-AI

img_AtlasAI

AirGo Design’s ATLAS-AI, a proprietary AI-assisted CAE simulation software, offers a suite of tools for manipulating FEM models with components made of highly anisotropic Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites.


Unlocking the Potential of Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastics

The growing demand for sustainable and high-performance engineering polymers has led to the development of injection molded (Short/Long) Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics Composites. FRTP represents a vital segment within the development of environmentally sustainable engineering plastics, poised to supplant metals in heavy-duty components, applied in aerospace, automotive, electronics etc.

Why Replace Metals with Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics?

img_why_replace_metal_with_FRT

FRTP composites are at the forefront of the metal replacement revolution, offering a transformative alternative for industries under pressure to reduce weight and environmental impact. Where traditional metals face limitations—such as susceptibility to fatigue, oxidation, or excessive energy consumption in production—FRTP delivers comparable (or superior) mechanical performance with added benefits like vibration damping and electrical insulation.

The Challenge with Designing FRTP Heavy-duty Components

Even though this class of reinforced polymers have been utilized in the industry for decades, their full potential has been hindered by conventional CAE simulation methods’ inability to accurately simulate their material behavior on component level. This limitation has confined their application primarily to less demanding secondary structures.

The mechanical performance of Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics components are intricately tied to geometry, material selection, and manufacturing parameters. Unlike its metallic counterparts, Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics components exhibit strong anisotropy—whereby stiffness and strength are influenced by fiber orientation. Fiber orientation is heavily dependent on a multitude of geometry and manufacturing factors.

img_FOT_in_FRT

When it comes to simulation using established detailed analysis tools such as Digimat and Altair Multiscale Designer, working between micro-scale and macro-scale demands significant time, expertise in various domains, and computing resources. Furthermore, accessing material property data (including material data for the components of the compound, filler etc.) and allowables are not always straightforward, often necessitating costly laboratory testing and specialized knowledge.

Airgo Design’s AI-powered ATLAS-AI suite addresses these issues head-on.


Why use ATLAS-AI?

AI and Data-Driven

Utilizing a statistically derived material property database, micro-level simulation becomes unnecessary. Fiber orientation data is meticulously adjusted based on structure geometry for accuracy.

Fast Yet Accurate

ATLAS-AI delivers fast results without sacrificing accuracy. It captures multi-layer property variations through the thickness of the part—without requiring high-resolution FEM models. Since it operates entirely in pre- and post-processing, there’s no need for co-simulation or data exchange with external software. This results in:

Proprietary Failure Model

ATLAS-AI incorporates a custom-developed failure criterion that outperforms conventional models by leveraging AI-generated allowables, enabling more accurate and reliable failure prediction.

Material/Software Agnostic

ATLAS-AI is fully compatible with a broad range of FEA platforms—supporting both implicit and explicit solvers—and is applicable to all types of fiber-reinforced thermoplastics, regardless of chemical composition.

Third-Party Validated

Blind validation exercises were conducted with Mitsubishi Chemicals Advanced Materials (MCAM) and SAFRAN on two different fiber-reinforced thermoplastic material projects, i.e., comparing Atlas-AI vs conventional CAE methods. Atlas-AI models completed with less time and predictions were closer to actual physical testing data, in comparison to conventional CAE simulation undertaken by MCAM and Safran engineering teams.


img_CAE_metal_vs_FRT


Where Does Atlas-AI Fit In?

AirGo Design’s ATLAS-AI suits streamline structural analysis by bridging the gap between injection molding simulations and accurate FEA models.

img_wheredowefit

Unlike conventional tools that merely map fiber orientation tensor data from a flow analysis software,(i.e. Moldflow and Moldex3D), to a separate structural mesh, ATLAS-AI intelligently adapts anisotropic material properties based on both geometry and material selection.


ATLAS-AI at a Glance

ATLAS-AI currently consists of 5 main modules:-AtlasMat, AtlasPre, AtlasPost, AtlasXL, and AtlasEndura.

img_AtlasAI_alltools

Workflow

Shown below is an example of how the modules are typically integrated into a FEM analysis. AtlasPre takes the information from the manufacturing simulation and integrates the anisotropic properties to the FEM model. After the simulation, AtlasPost is used to post-process and generate result images.

img_Workflow


Accuracy with ATLAS-MAT

ATLAS-MAT is an internal module (not available for licensing) within the ATLAS-AI suite that uses a pre-trained algorithm based on historical data to generate anisotropic material properties of Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites that change based on fiber orientation.

ATLAS-MAT’s Data-Corrected Micromechanics (DCM) has proven to be accurate. Shown below is a comparison of accuracy between Tsai-Hill method and ATLAS-MAT method on predicting 45-degree Tensile strength (S45) and 45-degree stiffness (E45) over a set of 16 different Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic materials. The ATLAS-MAT prediction showed a significantly lower error percentage over all the grades of Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic materials.

img_tsaihill vs atlasmat

Validation with Actual Parts

Case Study (1) Aircraft Armrest

The ATLAS-AI-integrated FEM models were evaluated on an established AirGo Design’s CARBON aircraft seat armrest component. It is noteworthy that ATLAS-AI methodology was originally applied in development of the CARBON seats starting from design/manufacturing of the armrest, which was fabricated and tested according to standard abuse loads. The material grade is of the PEI family with 20% carbon fiber content.

img_CARBON_Armrest

The structural simulations were conducted with Ansys LS-Dyna. To achieve better precision in simulating the armrest’s deformation under load, the FEM model incorporates not only the armrest itself but also the test rig it is secured to.

img_CARBON_Armrest_FEM

For comparison, the analysis was conducted on three different Armrest model:

  1. Anisotropic armrest LS-Dyna model created using ATLAS-AI integrated with Moldflow
  2. Anisotropic armrest LS-Dyna model created using ATLAS-AI integrated with Moldex3D BLM method.
  3. Quasi-isotropic armrest LS-Dyna model, assuming a conventional 70% knockdown factor on the TDS 0-degree stress-strain curve. (i.e. without ATLAS-AI and Moldex3D)

Pre-Processing for Anisotropic models

Moldflow and Moldex3D were used to generate fiber orientation tensor (FOT) data required as input for ATLAS-Pre (ATLAS-AI’s dedicated pre-processor for creating anisotropic FEM models). ATLAS-Pre not only maps the fiber orientation tensor onto the dissimilar structure mesh but also recalibrates the data, factoring in the geometry features and material statistical data, thus ensuring higher simulation accuracy.

img_CARBON_Armrest_atlasPre_1

The anisotropic material cards are then defined and assigned according to the modified fiber orientation tensor profile for each element. Material properties for all fiber orientation tensor variations are based on the supplied AtlasMat file.

img_CARBON_Armrest_atlasPre_2

Load vs Displacement

Based on the load displacement curves for test and FEM, the ATLAS-AI/Moldflow model achieved 70% accuracy whereas the ATLAS-AI/Moldex3D model demonstrated a notable 91.8% accuracy, outperforming conventional method with 59.2%.

img_CARBON_Armrest_FEM_vs_Test

Failure Prediction

ATLAS-Post was used to assess ATLAS-AI’s proprietary Y-Failure Criterion and compared with actual part failure. Y-Failure plots show the onset of failure around the inner horizontal rib location. Analysis of test pictures showed strong indications that the failure was likely to have been initiated at the same rib location.

img_CARBON_Armrest_FailurePrediction


Case Study (2) Pole Extender

ATLAS-AI was also assessed on 60% short glass fiber reinforced Polyarylamide (PARA) pole extender. The component was designed and tested to withstand up to 900N bending load.

img_PoleExtender

Figure below shows the component being attached to the test rig in a cantilever position. On the other end of the pole extender, a metal block is attached to distribute the applied load evenly onto the specimen.

img_PoleExtender_Test_and_FEM

Preprocessing and Setup

Similar to the previous case study, the component was also simulated for both anisotropic and conventional quasi-isotropic material methods. The FEM model also includes the test rig to obtain better precision in displacement results.

Load vs Displacement

Both ATLAS-AI/Moldflow and ATLAS-AI/Moldex3D anisotropic model achieved accuracies above 90%, compared to the 74.2% conventional method.

img_PoleExtender_FEM_vs_Test

Failure Prediction

Atlas-Post was used to assess ATLAS-AI’s proprietary Y-Failure Criterion. The simulation accurately predicted the failure location at the fastener point.

img_PoleExtender_FailurePrediction

Key Takeaway

ATLAS-AI has demonstrated its precision across numerous Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics grades and has been validated on existing components made from these materials. This empowers engineers with more efficient and accurate simulations, resulting in (i) lighter models, (ii) quicker run-time, and (iii) increased reliability in simulation results.

About us

AirGo develops innovative lightweight technologies for demanding applications in various industries. https://www.airgodesign.com/company


Contact Us

For more information or a demo, email to atlas@airgodesign.com